-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 547
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: update mergify rules for kubernetes 1.27 #3744
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
changes are required here first https://github.com/ceph/ceph-csi/blob/devel/.github/workflows/pull-request-commentor.yaml
with: | ||
issue-number: ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} | ||
body: | | ||
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.27 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we run all the tests on kubernetes 1.27 and see if deployment and E2E pass before mering the PR?
Ideally, we should have 2 PR's one for GitHub action change and another for mergify. If github action works fine, we can merge the mergigy PR as we won't be blocking other PRs from mergify if there is any issue with 1.27
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, sure. I'll run all the tests.
Okay, I'll add that to another PR then.
Thanks!
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e/k8s-1.27 |
/test ci/centos/mini-e2e-helm/k8s-1.27 |
/test ci/centos/k8s-e2e-external-storage/1.27 |
@Madhu-1 could you please remove ci/skip/e2e label here. Seems like I don't have access to do so. |
its added by the mergify bot, i think it will readd it again if i remove it can you please test this one on any other PR's? |
Yes, sure. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not possible to merge this one until 1.2 CI passes
@Mergifyio rebase |
✅ Branch has been successfully rebased |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems Kubernetes 1.27 CI jobs are passing in #3608.
Yes! |
considering 1.27 passes, @Madhu-1 can you remove the |
@Mergifyio rebase |
Signed-off-by: riya-singhal31 <rsinghal@redhat.com>
✅ Branch has been successfully rebased |
Updated mergify rules to consider tests on Kubernetes 1.27